99 Papers Reviews =link= Instant
But the other 96? Erasmus ate them. Reviews full of sterile, correct, utterly meaningless jargon flooded the submission system. “The state diagram in Figure 4 lacks clarity.” “The baseline comparison in Table 2 is underpowered.” “The authors should consider a sensitivity analysis.”
“Of course,” he lied.
He submitted review #99 with thirty minutes to spare. He closed his laptop. The house was silent. The sink was still leaking. A bird sang outside his window. He felt nothing. Not relief. Not pride. Just a vast, echoing emptiness where his professional conscience used to be. 99 papers reviews