Naughty America On Telegram May 2026

Meanwhile, some Telegram channels tried to legitimize themselves, rebranding as “Naughty America Discussion” or “NA Fan Hub,” where users shared reviews, scene requests, and tips on legal subscriptions. But these were the minority. The vast majority remained illicit archives, fueled by a demand for free content and a disregard for digital ownership.

But the story doesn’t end with piracy. The very nature of Telegram—encrypted, decentralized, and with weak proactive moderation—created other problems. Scammers flooded these channels with “premium VIP access” offers, tricking users into paying for already-free stolen content. Malware links appeared disguised as “rare scene downloads.” Bots harvested usernames and phone numbers for spam campaigns.

The scale was staggering. A single popular channel could have 50,000 to 200,000 subscribers. The content was organized meticulously—by series, by actress, by release date. For a casual user, it felt like a backdoor archive. For the company, it represented millions in lost revenue. naughty america on telegram

But on Telegram, “Naughty America” became a keyword—a digital signpost. Users created channels with titles like “Naughty America Premium Leaks,” “NA Full Archive 2024,” or “Daily Naughty America Updates.” These channels did not represent the official company. Instead, they were piracy rings. Someone would purchase a monthly subscription to the official site, download hundreds of videos, and re-upload them to a cloud storage service like Mega or GoFile. Then, they’d post the links in a Telegram channel, often with a bot that auto-posts new releases within hours of their official debut.

Yet, the ecosystem persists in smaller, private invite-only groups. The story of “Naughty America on Telegram” is not just about adult content—it’s about the tension between privacy and piracy, between community and crime, on a platform that values one over the other. For every curious user who types that phrase into Telegram’s search bar, they find not the official brand, but a shadow library: free, vast, and entirely unauthorized. And that, for better or worse, is the truth of what “Naughty America on Telegram” really means. But the story doesn’t end with piracy

In response, Naughty America—like many adult production companies—began a quiet, ongoing war. They hired anti-piracy firms such as Ceartas or Markscan to send Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices to Telegram. But Telegram’s response has historically been slow. Channels get deleted, but new ones reappear under slightly different names within hours. It’s a game of whack-a-mole played with code and legal letters.

It was here that the name “Naughty America” began to circulate widely. For the uninitiated, Naughty America is a legitimate, long-standing adult entertainment studio founded in 2001, famous for its “My Friend’s Hot Mom,” “Milf Sugar Babies,” and “Naughty Office” series. It operates on a subscription model, with content protected by copyright. Malware links appeared disguised as “rare scene downloads

By 2025, the situation had become a case study in the platform’s challenges. Journalists and digital rights researchers pointed out that Telegram’s founder, Pavel Durov, had been arrested in France in late 2024 partly due to the platform’s failure to curb such large-scale copyright infringement and other illegal activities. Following that, Telegram quietly updated its moderation policies, using more AI tools to detect and remove copyrighted adult material. Some of the biggest “Naughty America” channels disappeared overnight.

Today, we've updated the Express Edition ODBC Driver for Oracle.

Installation and configuration takes only minutes, by following the documentation which remains available anytime, specifically for this driver on OS X and Windows.

Release 7.0 licenses are also available for immediate purchase.

Client Platform Support

Release 7.0 installers are available for immediate download for Mac and Windows. (Express Edition is not typically produced for Linux and other Unix-like OS will be available soon; please contact us if you have specific need.)

Release 7.0 supports all 32-bit and 64-bit ODBC client tools and applications, both GUI and command-line, on —

DBMS Version Support

The Release 7.0 Express Edition ODBC Driver supports virtually every version of Oracle in current use, including —

Changes since Release 6.x

Additions

• Support for Oracle 12c

• Support for OS X Yosemite, Windows 8, and Windows Server 2012

Fixes

• Enhanced support for Oracle 11g

• Enhanced support for OS X Mavericks

In coming months, we'll be gradually shipping Release 7.0 of all our UDA drivers. This post will be the first of many, describing some of the fixes, changes, and improvements in each driver as they are made available.

Today, we have the Lite Edition ODBC Drivers for Sybase and Microsoft SQL Server.

Installation and configuration takes only minutes, by following the documentation which remains available anytime, specifically for this driver on OS X and Windows.

Release 7.0 licenses are also available for immediate purchase.

Client Platform Support

Release 7.0 installers are available for immediate download for Mac and Windows. Builds for Linux and other Unix-like OS will be available soon; please contact us if you have urgent need.

Release 7.0 supports all 32-bit and 64-bit ODBC client tools and applications, both GUI and command-line, on —

DBMS Version Support

The Release 7.0 Lite Edition ODBC Driver supports virtually every version of Microsoft SQL Server and Sybase Adaptive Server in current use, including —

Changes since Release 6.x

Additions

• added support for SPARSE columns in SQLColumns() call

• added DSN options SHOWSPARSECOLS / ShowSparseCols and Multi-Tier connect option -X )

• details, based on test table:

       
  CREATE TABLE tbl_sparse_test 
    ( col1  INT SPARSE
    , col2  INT
    , col3  XML COLUMN_SET FOR ALL_SPARSE_COLUMNS 
    )
  
       
      

  • wildcard query will return only col2 and col3; will not include SPARSE columns. This is standard SQL Server behavior, and it cannot be changed.

           
    SELECT * 
      FROM tbl_sparse_test
      ;
    
           
          

    To include SPARSE columns in results, they must be explicitly SELECTed

           
    SELECT col1, col2, col3 
      FROM tbl_sparse_test
      ;
    
           
          

  • By default, calls to SQLColumns() don't return Sparse Columns. To receive full columns list:

    • via our Lite Edition ODBC driver —

      1. open connection with SHOWSPARSECOLS in DSN connection string, e.g., "DSN=TdsSQL;UID=sa;PWD=sa;SHOWSPARSECOLS=Y;"

      2. SQLColumns (hstmt, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, L"tbl_sparse_test", SQL_NTS, NULL, 0 );

    • via the Microsoft ODBC driver —

      1. SQLSetStmtAttr (hstmt, SQL_SOPT_SS_NAME_SCOPE, (SQLPOINTER)SQL_SS_NAME_SCOPE_EXTENDED, SQL_IS_SMALLINT);

      2. SQLColumns (hstmt, L"tempdb", SQL_NTS, L"dbo", SQL_NTS, L"tbl_sparse_test", SQL_NTS, NULL, 0 );

• added support for new SQL Server datatypes such as datetime2

• added support for NBCROW token

• added support for Sybase 15

  • added support for BIGDATETIME and BIGTIME

  • added support for UNITEXT

  • added support for UNSIGNED BIGINT

Fixes

• fixed issue with SQL Server BIT datatype

• fixed memory overwrite error, when DB procedure is called with SQL_PARAM_OUTPUT parameter of CHAR/VARCHAR/LONGVARCHAR

• fixed issue with VARBINARY datatype and DB procedures

• fixed issue with converting TIMESTAMP to CHAR/WCHAR

• fixed datatype info in SQLGetTypeInfo -- new Sybase and MSSQL datatypes were added

• fixed database catalog and query metadata info for Sybase 15's UNSIGNED INT, UNSIGNED SMALLINT, BIGINT, SYSNAME, LONGSYSNAME

Situation Analysis

It's the year 2015, and the fundamental issues associated with the utility of data access drivers remain confusing. Basically, we remain uncertain about the value-to-compensation alignment of ODBC (Open Database Connectivity), JDBC (Java Database Connectivity), and ADO.NET drivers/providers.

ODBC	JDBC
ADO.NET

Why do we pay for anything?

After allowing for consumer irrationality [1], the basis of any payment is fundamentally tied to the monetization of opportunity costs. Essentially, we pay for one thing to alleviate the (usually higher) costs of something else.

The rest of this post focuses on highlighting the real pains associated with the $0.00 value misconception associated with Data Access Drivers: ODBC, JDBC, ADO.NET, OLE-DB, etc.

Real Costs of Data Access Drivers

In the most basic sense, there are some fundamental aspects of data access that are complex to implement and rarely implemented (if at all) by free drivers. The list includes:

• Escape Syntaxes for Dates and Functions -- abstraction for dates and function signatures at the application level (i.e., the same abstraction works across all compliant databases)
• Metadata Calls which enable smarter ODBC compliant applications -- this feature is typically missing in Drivers and abused by the Clients (consumers); i.e., clients are made DBMS specific by testing for specific DBMS names, rather than utilizing feature and functionality metadata returned by drivers
• Scrollable Cursors -- this is how you deal with change sensitivity and paging through large datasets; some drivers actually fake support and get away with it due to shortage of applications to test proper cursor types (Static, Forward-Only, Key-Set, Dynamic, and Mixed models).

Beyond actual driver sophistication, in regards to key feature implementations, let's up the ante by veering into the area of data security. At the most basic level, It's extremely important to understand that all data access drivers provide read-write access to your databases; thus, it's imperative that data access drivers address the following:

• Read-Only or Read-Write Access modalities scoped to specific
  • users
  • user groups
  • target databases
  • data access standards (e.g., ODBC, JDBC, ADO.NET)
  • client applications
  • client host operating systems
  • client host IP addresses
• Any combination of the above as part of a configurable collection of data access rules (or policies).

Once you're done with security, you then have the thorny issue of data access and data flow management. In a nutshell, your driver needs to be able to handle:

• Protection against Cartesian-product-based network flooding (e.g., user queries an enormous table without knowing or understanding back-end implications)
• Enabling or Disabling of key DBMS engine data access optimization features (e.g. SQL RDBMS-specific extensions exposed via Environment Variables or SQL-command-based settings)
• Conditional Connection Pooling across various dimensions such as Users, User Groups, Applications, Host Operating Systems, IP Addresses
• Encryption of Data in Transit

Once you've dealt with Security and Data Flow, you then have to address the enforcement of these settings across a myriad of ODBC compliant host, which is where Zeroconfig and centralized data access administration comes into play i.e., configure once (locally) and enforce globally.

OpenLink Universal Data Access (UDA) Drivers

When OpenLink Software entered the ODBC Driver Market segment (circa 1992), the issues above were the fundamental basis of our Multi-Tier Drivers. Although the marketplace highlighted our drivers for high performance, stability, and specification adherence -- to all of which we remain committed -- our fundamental engineering focus has always been skewed towards configurable data security, platform independence, and scalability.

Every item of concern outlined in the section above is addressed by security features built into our Multi-Tier Drivers [2][3][4]. These features all leverage the fact that our multi-tier drivers include a sophisticated DB session rules book that enables construction and enforcement of user attribute (user name, application, client operating system, IP address, target database etc.) based rules which are applied to all database sessions (single or pooled).

Today, in the year 2015, the security issues that pervade Data Access, whether via Native SQL RDBMS Drivers, or ODBC, JDBC, and ADO.NET Drivers/Providers, have only increased, courtesy of ubiquitous computing -- facilitated by the Internet & Web, across desktop and mobile device dimensions. Paradoxically, there remains a fundamental illusion that all Data Access Drivers are made the same; i.e., they simply provide you with the ability to connect to SQL RDBMS back-ends, for the industry standard price of $0.00, without consequence -- thereby skewing the very nature of SQL RDBMS data access and its security and privacy implications.

I hope that this post brings some clarity to a very serious security and general configuration management issues associated with Data Access Drivers. Free ODBC Drivers offer nothing; that's why they cost $0.00. When dealing with real issues associated with Open Data Access, you must have a handle on the inevitable issues of data security and privacy.

Links

1. The Irrational Consumer: Why Economics Is Dead Wrong About How We Make Choices
2. OpenLink Multi-Tier ODBC Drivers
3. OpenLink Multi-Tier JDBC Drivers
4. OpenLink Multi-Tier ADO.NET Providers

Related

• Oracle Security Auditing Horror Stories -- showcases social dimension of security that exploits literal identifiers used by SQL RDBMS products in regards to user identity
• Database Security Strategies Need to Grow Up in 2010
• Whose Data is it? Part 1
• Whose Data is it? Part 2