Kamal famously wrote: “The Qur’an is not a textbook of geology, but it is a textbook of methodology.” He argued that the repeated Qur’anic injunctions to “travel through the earth” (29:20), “contemplate the heavens” (3:190), and “reflect” ( ta‘aqqul ) are not poetic ornaments. They are . To practice science is, in a profound sense, to obey the Qur’an.
For Zakaria Kamal, the deepest act of scientific tafsir was not to find a verse predicting the Big Bang. It was to look through a telescope and, in that very act of measurement and calculation, perform a silent dhikr . The scientist, when honest, is a theologian of the concrete. And the Qur’an, when read philosophically, is the manual for that theology. scientific tafsir zakaria kamal
Thus, scientific tafsir, for Kamal, is the act of reading the Ayat al-Takwiniyya (cosmic verses) with the same hermeneutic rigor as the Ayat al-Tashri’iyya (legal verses). Both require ijtihad (independent reasoning). The scientist is the mujtahid of nature. Here is where Kamal departs most radically from mainstream i’jaz writers. He was deeply suspicious of literalism. For example, when the Qur’an describes the heavens as a “roof” (21:32) or the sun setting in a muddy spring (18:86), the i’jaz writer contorts physics to fit the literal. Kamal, drawing on his existentialist training (he was a scholar of Heidegger and Sartre), insisted on symbolic hermeneutics . Kamal famously wrote: “The Qur’an is not a
He would take a surah (e.g., Surah al-Rahman or Surah al-Waqi’a) and ask: what kind of natural attitude does this text produce? He concluded that the Qur’an generates an attitude of wonder mixed with rigor . The believer looks at a mountain. The geologist sees plate tectonics. The tafsir ‘ilmi , per Kamal, does not deny tectonics but asks: why is there a law of tectonics at all? Why is there regularity? Why is the universe knowable? For Zakaria Kamal, the deepest act of scientific
Kamal famously wrote: “The Qur’an is not a textbook of geology, but it is a textbook of methodology.” He argued that the repeated Qur’anic injunctions to “travel through the earth” (29:20), “contemplate the heavens” (3:190), and “reflect” ( ta‘aqqul ) are not poetic ornaments. They are . To practice science is, in a profound sense, to obey the Qur’an.
For Zakaria Kamal, the deepest act of scientific tafsir was not to find a verse predicting the Big Bang. It was to look through a telescope and, in that very act of measurement and calculation, perform a silent dhikr . The scientist, when honest, is a theologian of the concrete. And the Qur’an, when read philosophically, is the manual for that theology.
Thus, scientific tafsir, for Kamal, is the act of reading the Ayat al-Takwiniyya (cosmic verses) with the same hermeneutic rigor as the Ayat al-Tashri’iyya (legal verses). Both require ijtihad (independent reasoning). The scientist is the mujtahid of nature. Here is where Kamal departs most radically from mainstream i’jaz writers. He was deeply suspicious of literalism. For example, when the Qur’an describes the heavens as a “roof” (21:32) or the sun setting in a muddy spring (18:86), the i’jaz writer contorts physics to fit the literal. Kamal, drawing on his existentialist training (he was a scholar of Heidegger and Sartre), insisted on symbolic hermeneutics .
He would take a surah (e.g., Surah al-Rahman or Surah al-Waqi’a) and ask: what kind of natural attitude does this text produce? He concluded that the Qur’an generates an attitude of wonder mixed with rigor . The believer looks at a mountain. The geologist sees plate tectonics. The tafsir ‘ilmi , per Kamal, does not deny tectonics but asks: why is there a law of tectonics at all? Why is there regularity? Why is the universe knowable?
2009 © Век Вендинга - тематический вендинг портал
© 2026 — Nova Lighthouse