After completing a non-recruitment practice test, SHL provides a percentile rank and breakdown by competency (e.g., “numeric estimation” vs “data interpretation”). Many employers don’t share results, but when they do, SHL’s reporting is clear and actionable.
If you’ve applied to a large multinational bank, consulting firm, FMCG, or tech company in the last five years, you’ve likely encountered SHL. They are one of the “big three” psychometric testing providers (alongside Kenexa and Talent Q). After taking multiple SHL assessments for graduate schemes and mid-level roles, here is my in-depth review. 1. Real-World Simulation Unlike some abstract reasoning tests, SHL’s newer “Interactive” and “Verify” series feel relevant. The verbal reasoning uses authentic business memos, and the numerical tests present realistic data tables (sales figures, market share, HR metrics). You aren’t just solving equations; you’re interpreting information a manager would see. shl tests
Take them seriously, prepare relentlessly, but don’t internalize a poor score. Even SHL admits these tests are moderate predictors at best. Some of the best colleagues I’ve worked with failed SHL tests the first time. They are one of the “big three” psychometric
SHL’s verbal section is infamous for “True / False / Cannot Say.” They craft statements that seem obviously true based on common sense, but the passage does not explicitly state them. Example: Passage says “Sales rose in Q3.” Statement: “Sales were higher in Q3 than Q2.” Answer: Cannot Say (Q2 data isn’t given). It’s logically correct, but maddening under a timer. but maddening under a timer.