This book is pragmatical, not philosophical; a practical manual, not a treatise upon theories. It is intended for the men and women whose most pressing need is for money; who wish to get rich first, and philosophize afterward. It is for those who have, so far, found neither the time, the means, nor the opportunity to go deeply into the study of metaphysics, but who want results and who are willing to take the conclusions of science as a basis for action, without going into all the processes by which those conclusions were reached.
It is expected that the reader will take the fundamental statements upon faith, just as he would take statements concerning a law of electrical action if they were promulgated by a Marconi or an Edison; and, taking the statements upon faith, that he will prove their truth by acting upon them without fear or hesitation. Every man or woman who does this will certainly get rich; for the science herein applied is an exact science, and failure is impossible. For the benefit, however, of those who wish to investigate philosophical theories and so secure a logical basis for faith, I will here cite certain authorities.
The monistic theory of the universe—the theory that One is All, and that All is One; that one Substance manifests itself as the seeming many elements of the material world—is of Hindu origin, and has been gradually winning its way into the thought of the western world for two hundred years. It is the foundation of all the Oriental philosophies, and of those of Descartes, Spinoza, Leibnitz, Schopenhauer, Hegel, and Emerson.
The reader who would dig to the philosophical foundations is advised to read Hegel and Emerson; and he will do well to read “The Eternal News,” a very excellent pamphlet published by J. J. Brown, 300 Cathcart Road, Govanhill, Glasgow, Scotland. He may also find some help in a series of articles written by the author, which were published in Nautilus (Holyoke, Mass.) during the spring and summer of 1909, under the title “What is Truth?”
In writing this book I have sacrificed all other considerations to plainness and simplicity of style, so that all might understand. The plan of action laid down herein was deduced from the conclusions of philosophy; it has been thoroughly tested, and bears the supreme test of practical experiment; it works. If you wish to know how the conclusions were arrived at, read the writings of the authors mentioned above; and if you wish to reap the fruits of their philosophies in actual practice, read this book and do exactly as it tells you to do.
The Author.
And maybe that’s the real vine worth swinging on.
Here’s a draft for a thought-provoking blog post titled: When you hear Tarzan & Jane , what comes to mind? A loincloth-clad man swinging through vines? A plucky Victorian woman fainting into muscular arms? At first glance, their story seems like a colonial-era fantasy—problematic, dated, and ripe for eye-rolling. tarzan & jane
But dig deeper, and Tarzan & Jane might just hold a surprising mirror to 21st-century relationships. Tarzan was raised by apes. Jane was raised with teacups and etiquette. Their survival—and eventual love—depended on one thing: adaptation . Tarzan learns English; Jane learns to hunt. Neither stays who they were. In today’s world, where couples juggle careers, cultures, and changing identities, rigidity is the death of intimacy. Tarzan & Jane didn’t change for each other—they changed because of each other. Modern take : Love isn’t about finding your exact match. It’s about mutual evolution. 2. Communication Beyond Words Tarzan famously communicates through gesture, touch, and primal sound. Jane translates. But here’s the twist: she doesn’t “civilize” him . Instead, she learns his language first. In an age of endless texting and misinterpreted emojis, the Tarzan-Jane dynamic reminds us that true connection often happens below the neck—in safety, eye contact, and shared silence. Modern take : The best partners are bilingual in emotion—fluent in both spoken and unspoken cues. 3. The Colonial Elephant in the Room Let’s not romanticize blindly. Early Tarzan stories carried heavy baggage: the “white savior” trope, the idea of the “noble savage,” and a woman whose primary role was to soften a wild man. But modern retellings (like The Legend of Tarzan 2016) flip the script. Jane is a fighter, a scholar, and an equal. She doesn’t tame Tarzan—she chooses his world on her own terms. Modern take : Reclaiming old stories means keeping the chemistry while discarding the power imbalance. 4. Shared Vulnerability Tarzan’s greatest fear isn’t a leopard—it’s losing Jane. Jane’s isn’t the jungle—it’s loneliness. Their love works because both are willing to be vulnerable in alien environments. He admits he doesn’t understand “civilization.” She admits she’s afraid of the dark. In an era of curated Instagram relationships, that raw, mutual vulnerability feels almost revolutionary. Final Swing Tarzan & Jane aren’t a model for every relationship—they’re a metaphor. Two wildly different beings, raised in separate worlds, who choose to build a third world together. Not without friction. Not without privilege or blind spots. But with respect, curiosity, and a willingness to learn each other’s wild. And maybe that’s the real vine worth swinging on